New to MyHealth?
Manage Your Care From Anywhere.
Access your health information from any device with MyHealth. ÌýYou can message your clinic, view lab results, schedule an appointment, and pay your bill.
ALREADY HAVE AN ACCESS CODE?
DON'T HAVE AN ACCESS CODE?
NEED MORE DETAILS?
MyHealth for Mobile
WELCOME BACK
REPORT OF THE NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH TASK FORCE ON RESEARCH STANDARDS FOR CHRONIC LOW BACK PAIN
À¶Ý®ÊÓÆµ
REPORT OF THE NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH TASK FORCE ON RESEARCH STANDARDS FOR CHRONIC LOW BACK PAIN JOURNAL OF MANIPULATIVE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL THERAPEUTICS Deyo, R. A., Dworkin, S. F., Amtmann, D., Andersson, G., Borenstein, D., Carragee, E., Carrino, J., Chou, R., Cook, K., Delitto, A., Goertz, C., Khalsa, P., Loeser, J., Mackey, S., Panagis, J., Rainville, J., Tosteson, T., Turk, D., von Korff, M., Weiner, D. K. 2014; 37 (7): 449-467Abstract
Despite rapidly increasing intervention, functional disability due to chronic low back pain (cLBP) has increased in recent decades. We often cannot identify mechanisms to explain the major negative impact cLBP has on patients' lives. Such cLBP is often termed nonspecific and may be due to multiple biologic and behavioral etiologies. Researchers use varied inclusion criteria, definitions, baseline assessments, and outcome measures, which impede comparisons and consensus. The purpose of this article is to disseminate the report of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) task force on À¶Ý®ÊÓÆµ standards for cLBP.The NIH Pain Consortium charged a À¶Ý®ÊÓÆµ task force (RTF) to draft standards for À¶Ý®ÊÓÆµ on cLBP. The resulting multidisciplinary panel developed a 3-stage process, each with a 2-day meeting.The panel recommended using 2 questions to define cLBP; classifying cLBP by its impact (defined by pain intensity, pain interference, and physical function); use of a minimal data set to describe À¶Ý®ÊÓÆµ subjects (drawing heavily on the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System methodology); reporting "responder analyses" in addition to mean outcome scores; and suggestions for future À¶Ý®ÊÓÆµ and dissemination. The Pain Consortium has approved these recommendations, which investigators should incorporate into NIH grant proposals.The RTF believes that these recommendations will advance the field, help to resolve controversies, and facilitate future À¶Ý®ÊÓÆµ addressing the genomic, neurologic, and other mechanistic substrates of cLBP. Greater consistency in reporting should facilitate comparisons among studies and the development of phenotypes. We expect the RTF recommendations will become a dynamic document and undergo continual improvement.
View details for
View details for